
100+ Docker应用合集:NAS必备工具一览
前言 大家好,这里是可爱的Cherry,热爱于分享NAS、docker玩耍经验~ 正所谓,万物皆可docker,如果不能docker,那一定是你的不对,不是docker的不对! Cherry已发布了100多期《开源&&doc...

前言 大家好,这里是可爱的Cherry,热爱于分享NAS、docker玩耍经验~ 正所谓,万物皆可docker,如果不能docker,那一定是你的不对,不是docker的不对! Cherry已发布了100多期《开源&&doc...

编辑:Sia 这个 AI 科代表,可以领回家了。 听播客,尤其是时长几小时的硬核类节目,是件特别花时间的事情。为了不听也能 get 到内容,今年 3 月,我们利用了大模型( AI 在用 | 有了这个超级提示和Claude 3,不听...

来源:少数派 Matrix 首页推荐 Matrix 是少数派的写作社区,我们主张分享真实的产品体验,有实用价值的经验与思考。我们会不定期挑选 Matrix 最优质的文章,展示来自用户的最真实的体验和观点。 文章代表作者个人观点,少数派仅对...

1、前言 最近NAS圈最值得令人开心的事当然是又一个技术团队现身,公布了一款全新国产的免费NAS系统–飞牛OS,有更多的竞争和对比,也能给这个圈子带来更多的活力,至少对用户来说肯定是一个非常好的消息,当然虽然当前飞牛OS完成度和...
Valve has officially pulled the plug. The beloved $399 entry-level Steam Deck LCD model is no more, out of production, and vanished from the US store. This isn't a stock hiccup. Valve's site unequivocally states: "We are no longer producing the Steam Deck LCD." For countless gamers, this marks the abrupt end of an accessible era for handheld PC gaming. What now? What insights can we glean from Valve's strategic shift in the booming handheld market? This move reshapes the landscape for portable PC enthusiasts.
The 64GB LCD Steam Deck, once the wallet-friendly gateway to portable PC gaming, is gone. Its window of opportunity? Slammed shut. The US Steam store now lists it as "out of stock," with a stark discontinuation notice. No shocker here. This follows Valve's strategic dance since the Steam Deck OLED's debut. The OLED, with its stunning display, boosted battery, and lighter chassis, grabbed headlines. But the original LCD, especially that 64GB variant, served a vital role: it democratized PC gaming on the go, making powerful handhelds accessible to millions. That era is over.
This $399 model's exit leaves a gaping hole in Valve's lineup. Before, a budget-friendly on-ramp existed. Now? The cheapest *new* Steam Deck is likely a remaining LCD unit (if any global stock clings on) or, more realistically, the pricier Steam Deck OLED. This isn't just a price bump; it's a new minimum investment for entry. Was the 64GB variant a razor-thin margin product? Or is Valve, like a seasoned conductor, directing every new customer toward the premium OLED experience, a device boasting fatter margins and a dazzling spec sheet? The market speaks.
This decision screams strategy. Valve, a company notorious for hardware refinement, is making a calculated move. Phasing out the lowest-tier LCD achieves multiple objectives. First, Streamlined Production: Fewer SKUs, especially focusing on OLED, means simplified logistics, potentially slashing manufacturing costs. Second, Driving OLED Adoption: With the budget option evaporated, price-conscious consumers might now leap to the OLED, embracing its significant upgrades. Third, Elevating Brand Perception: The OLED offers a genuinely premium experience. Prioritizing it solidifies the Steam Deck as a high-quality, top-tier handheld, not just a budget marvel. This isn't merely about silicon and screens; it's a bold market repositioning. Valve's conviction is clear: the OLED's enhanced experience is the future for new units.
So, that $399 Steam Deck LCD plan? Scrapped. What now? Your options are clear.
The entry-level Steam Deck LCD's demise is no mere product update. It's a seismic shift, a clear ripple across the dynamic pond of portable gaming. This signals market maturation: manufacturers are honing offerings, pivoting towards higher-value products. While the loss of the most affordable option stings, it whispers of a future where premium portable gaming experiences aren't just an option—they're the new baseline. What's your take on Valve's bold move? OLED upgrade? Refurbished hunt? Or a dive into competitor waters? Sound off below!
Forget mere nostalgia. 2025 wasn't just another calendar year; it was a seismic inflection point. A blur of rapid-fire innovations, market upheavals, and political machinations, yes. But as WIRED's "Uncanny Valley" podcast recently underscored, dissecting that pivotal year offers far more than a rearview mirror glance: it’s a vital blueprint for understanding the powerful, often volatile, confluence of technology and politics defining our present and future.
From the ethical minefield of generative AI to the baffling, meme-driven ascent of Dogecoin, 2025 delivered a masterclass. Digital frontiers transformed into battlegrounds for policy, power, and public opinion with astonishing speed. What were these defining moments? Crucially, what do they reveal about the tech-political landscape we’re navigating right now, and deep into 2026?
2025 saw AI truly flex its muscles. Not just incremental improvements, but astonishing leaps: think hyper-realistic deepfakes, sophisticated large language models (LLMs) like GPT-5, and automation permeating every sector from healthcare diagnostics to financial trading. With this immense power came intense political scrutiny. Governments, from Washington D.C.'s executive orders to Brussels' nascent AI Act, grappled with a thorny dilemma: how to rein in a technology evolving at warp speed without stifling its transformative potential.
The stakes are colossal. We’re talking algorithmic bias, unprecedented job displacement, national security implications, and a fierce global race for AI dominance. 2025's fragmented regulatory attempts — often reactive, rarely cohesive — merely set the stage. Expect 2026 to escalate this global chess match, dictating precisely where and how AI innovation flourishes, or falters, under the weight of legislative oversight.
WIRED's "Uncanny Valley" podcast wasn't exaggerating about the "crazy couple of months" surrounding Dogecoin in 2025. What began as a whimsical internet joke, born from a Shiba Inu meme, ballooned into a multi-billion-dollar, highly volatile financial instrument. It commanded unprecedented mainstream attention, fueled by celebrity endorsements and retail investor frenzy. This wasn't merely about speculative pumps and dumps; it was a stark, undeniable demonstration. Decentralized finance, driven by raw public sentiment and influential figures, could bypass traditional financial gatekeepers entirely, shaking the foundations of established monetary systems.
The DOGE effect forced regulators worldwide – from the SEC to the ECB – to confront crypto head-on. No longer a niche tech curiosity, it emerged as a genuine political and economic force. Expect 2026 to intensify debates over stablecoin regulation (think MiCA-like frameworks), the strategic role of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) in national sovereignty, and a persistent, often contentious, push to corral the 'Wild West' of crypto into a more structured, yet still fiercely debated, regulatory framework.
Our digital lives continue to expand, but so does the tension: individual data privacy versus national security interests. 2025 injected renewed urgency into this debate, fueled by state-sponsored cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, high-profile data breaches exposing millions of citizens’ sensitive health and financial records, and legislative efforts simultaneously aiming to protect personal data (like GDPR updates) and grant governments broader surveillance powers (think new intelligence mandates). Is a true balance achievable, or are we on an inevitable collision course?
The battle for control over our digital footprints is relentless. Expect 2026 to see the emergence of more robust privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) — zero-knowledge proofs, federated learning — alongside persistent calls for greater government access to encrypted communications. Companies, from tech giants to small startups, will find themselves increasingly trapped in the crossfire, navigating a labyrinthine web of international data transfer regulations, conflicting domestic legal demands, and the escalating expectations of privacy-conscious consumers.
The humble semiconductor chip, once a quiet component, roared into the spotlight as a central player in global politics during 2025. Nations, from the US with its CHIPS Act to the EU’s European Chips Act and China's aggressive self-sufficiency drives, recognized the strategic imperative of these tiny pieces of silicon. Efforts intensified to secure domestic supply chains, reduce reliance on single-point-of-failure producers like TSMC, and decouple from geopolitical rivals. Trade disputes over advanced fabrication equipment escalated. Tech manufacturing unequivocally became an explicit tool of foreign policy, a new form of economic warfare.
This isn't merely economic competition; it’s a high-stakes struggle for national sovereignty and technological independence. The stark lessons of 2025 guarantee that 2026 will bring continued, massive investment in domestic chip fabrication, aggressive diversification of supply sources, and an ongoing, explicit weaponization of technological exports. Prepare for geopolitical fault lines to be increasingly redrawn, not just by borders or ideologies, but by technological prowess and access to foundational silicon.
Disinformation isn't new, but 2025 unveiled its terrifying, AI-amplified evolution. Gone were crude Photoshop jobs. Instead, sophisticated deepfakes – hyper-realistic video, audio, and text – became virtually indistinguishable from reality. AI-generated narratives, often tailored to individual psychological profiles, could be disseminated with unprecedented speed, scale, and persuasive power. The impact was chilling: compromised electoral integrity, eroded public trust in institutions, and fractured societal cohesion. This wasn't just noise; it was a targeted assault on truth itself.
Addressing this existential threat is arguably the most pressing issue for democracies globally. As we hurtle into 2026, the fight against AI-amplified disinformation demands multi-faceted, urgent approaches: next-generation detection tools leveraging AI against itself, far greater platform accountability from social media giants, and a renewed, robust emphasis on critical media literacy for every citizen. The very fabric of informed public discourse, the bedrock of democratic function, hangs precariously in the balance.
WIRED's retrospective on 2025's tech-political trends isn't a mere recap; it's a stark warning. Technology and politics are no longer separate entities. They are inextricably fused, each force influencing, shaping, and often colliding with the other in real-time. From AI's ethical minefields to crypto's regulatory quagmires, the past year provided undeniable indicators of the turbulent landscape ahead.
As we march deeper into 2026, remaining informed and critically engaged with these overlapping narratives isn't just an intellectual pursuit for tech enthusiasts or political junkies. It is an absolute imperative. For citizens, policymakers, and businesses alike, understanding these dynamics will be essential to navigate the direction of our societies, economies, and democratic futures. The future isn't just coming; it's already here, demanding our full attention.
Forget what you thought you knew about chatbots. The long-anticipated moment has arrived: OpenAI has officially launched its GPT Store, complete with an open SDK for developers. This isn't just an incremental update; it's a foundational shift, catapulting ChatGPT from a powerful conversational AI into what CEO Sam Altman envisions as an 'everything app' – a singular hub for AI-powered interactions across countless services.
Wednesday evening, OpenAI unveiled a brand-new App Directory, inviting users to explore a vast universe of custom AI tools. Crucially, they've opened their SDK, empowering developers to construct intricate, interactive experiences directly within ChatGPT's familiar interface. But why does this move fundamentally reshape the AI landscape, and what does it truly signify for the future of software development?
Imagine an app store, but for hyper-specialized AI agents. That's the GPT Store. Instead of downloading standalone applications, users access purpose-built GPTs tailored for specific tasks – from debugging code and crafting marketing copy to orchestrating your next vacation or seamlessly integrating with your favorite music and food delivery services. This launch irrevocably transforms ChatGPT into a true, extensible platform.
The strategic importance of the accompanying SDK cannot be overstated. For developers, it's a golden key. It means direct integration with ChatGPT, leveraging its massive user base and sophisticated language models to forge novel applications. Developers are no longer merely building *on top* of OpenAI's APIs; they're building *within* ChatGPT itself, creating a fluid user experience that blurs the lines between intelligent bot and essential utility.
For the global developer community, the GPT Store and its SDK represent a monumental shift. It's a sprawling, fertile canvas for unprecedented innovation. Developers can now:
For businesses, this unlocks avenues for unprecedented operational efficiency and dynamic customer engagement. Picture a company deploying a custom GPT to autonomously handle specific customer support queries, generate hyper-personalized marketing campaigns, or even streamline complex internal data analysis. The possibilities for specialized, industry-specific AI tools are virtually limitless, promising to embed AI even deeper into daily workflows and strategic decision-making.
Sam Altman's ambitious vision for ChatGPT to evolve into an "everything app" is now tangibly closer. The raw input hinted at direct connections to services like Apple Music and DoorDash – painting a future where your AI assistant doesn't just answer questions, but actively orchestrates and manages your entire digital life.
Is ChatGPT truly poised to become the operating system of our digital interactions? If it can seamlessly integrate with the myriad apps and services we use daily, acting as an intelligent, proactive intermediary, then we are indeed witnessing the genesis of a future where one central AI interface could orchestrate everything: from ordering groceries and managing your calendar to curating your entertainment and booking travel.
This vision portends a profound consolidation of digital experiences, where the friction of switching between multiple applications is dramatically minimized. The implications for user experience, data privacy frameworks, and competitive landscapes are vast and will undoubtedly dominate tech discourse for the foreseeable future.
Naturally, with such transformative power come significant responsibilities and emergent challenges. Issues surrounding rigorous quality control, ensuring the discoverability of truly useful GPTs amidst a burgeoning catalog, and upholding stringent ethical AI practices will be paramount for both OpenAI and the wider developer community. However, this initial launch unequivocally marks a pivotal milestone.
The GPT Store transcends being merely a marketplace for AI tools; it's a definitive statement about the future trajectory of AI integration. It solidifies ChatGPT's position not just as a leading AI model, but as the foundational platform upon which the next generation of AI-powered services will be architected. Prepare yourself; the AI era is accelerating at warp speed, and the 'everything app' might just be closer than you ever imagined.
Hold onto your devices. Brace for higher prices. Micron, a global memory titan, just delivered a stark warning: the global memory shortage isn't merely a temporary glitch. CEO Sanjay Mehrotra, in their latest earnings report, revealed tight industry conditions across DRAM and NAND flash will persist well beyond 2026. This isn't just a headline; it's a multi-year forecast setting the stage for profound shifts across the entire tech ecosystem, from your smartphone to enterprise data centers.
Micron Technology, a titan alongside Samsung and SK Hynix in the 'big three' memory manufacturing landscape, didn't mince words. During their recent earnings call, CEO Sanjay Mehrotra explicitly stated that the supply of both DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory) and NAND flash memory will remain "substantially short of demand" for the foreseeable future. This isn't a quarterly blip; it's a projected multi-year scarcity extending deep into the mid-2020s, with 2027 now firmly in view. Consider the implications: a timeframe stretching far beyond typical semiconductor cycles, signaling a profound, structural imbalance. The world's appetite for digital infrastructure is insatiable, yet the very building blocks are becoming increasingly elusive.
Past semiconductor shortages, like the pandemic-induced snarls, felt temporary. Micron's current outlook, however, points to something far more deeply entrenched. This isn't a traffic jam; it's a fundamental capacity issue. What makes this particular RAM supply crunch so tenacious, threatening to become the new normal?
This isn't just a bottleneck. It's a widening chasm between an insatiable global appetite for memory and an inherently rigid, slow-to-expand manufacturing capability. The market is effectively running on fumes.
A multi-year RAM drought impacts everyone. Are you building a high-end gaming PC? Managing a hyperscale data center? Or simply eyeing that new smartphone? Prepare for repercussions. The most immediate, undeniable consequence will be significantly higher prices for memory components. This cost hike will inevitably cascade, making end products — from the latest iPhone and gaming laptops to mission-critical enterprise servers and graphics cards — substantially more expensive.
Your wallet will feel it. Upgrading that gaming rig or replacing an aging tablet transforms from a routine purchase into a major financial consideration. Beyond price, expect slower innovation cycles. New features, requiring more memory, may be delayed or arrive in more expensive, premium tiers as manufacturers grapple with component scarcity.
Micron's stark forecast isn't just a warning shot; it's a call to action for the entire tech ecosystem. From hyperscale cloud providers to consumer electronics giants, companies must adapt. This isn't a temporary inconvenience; it's a strategic inflection point. Key actions include:
The semiconductor industry has always been cyclical. But a scarcity extending "beyond 2026" demands more than just patience; it requires a fundamental rethinking of design, procurement, and innovation. How will this prolonged memory drought fundamentally reshape our digital world? The answer is unfolding, but a bumpy, transformative journey lies ahead.
Imagine falling in love with a face that doesn't exist. Conversing for weeks, even months, over video calls, building a profound connection – all with a digital phantom. This isn't science fiction. It's the chilling reality enabled by Haotian, a Chinese-language AI app now fueling a terrifying wave of romance scams. Forget doctored photos; Haotian delivers nearly flawless, live AI face-swapping during video chats, making digital deception virtually indistinguishable from genuine human interaction. Millions have already been lost.
Haotian is more than just an app; it's a sophisticated weapon in the hands of scammers. This advanced AI platform, once openly circulated through Telegram channels, offers users the power to seamlessly morph faces in real-time during live video calls. The result? Illusions so perfect they can fool even the most vigilant. It's digital puppetry, designed to exploit trust. What makes Haotian uniquely dangerous isn't just its technical prowess, but its insidious accessibility. It was marketed as a service, allowing criminal enterprises to purchase and integrate this powerful tool into their operations. The numbers scream: this app has facilitated scams totaling millions of dollars, carving out a lucrative, morally bankrupt business model built on the ruins of human emotions.
Romance scams are nothing new. We've all heard the cautionary tales: catfishing, elaborate sob stories, urgent pleas for money. But Haotian's live face-swapping capabilities introduce an entirely new dimension of fraud, a digital quicksand. Previously, a scammer might avoid video calls or use grainy, static images, raising red flags. Now, AI meticulously erases those crucial warning signs. This technology bypasses a fundamental psychological barrier, forging a deeper, utterly convincing sense of intimacy and authenticity. Victims genuinely believe they are interacting with the person whose face they see, making them profoundly susceptible to emotional manipulation and, inevitably, financial extortion. The emotional wreckage, once the truth shatters, is often far more devastating than any monetary loss. Trust shattered. Lives ruined.
There's a glimmer of hope: Haotian's primary distribution channel on Telegram reportedly vanished following an inquiry by WIRED. This proves public scrutiny and tenacious journalism can still make an impact, forcing these illicit operations underground. But it's a temporary reprieve, not a victory. Shutting down one channel doesn't dismantle the underlying technology or the vast criminal networks behind it. These groups are agile, adapting like chameleons, quickly migrating to new platforms or developing even more clandestine distribution methods. It's a relentless game of digital Whac-A-Mole, a stark reminder of the immense challenges facing cybersecurity experts, law enforcement, and platform providers in combating the misuse of rapidly evolving AI.
The rise of tools like Haotian irrevocably alters our digital landscape. We can no longer blindly trust what we see or hear online, especially in video form. This erosion of trust is a profound societal consequence demanding immediate attention. Digital literacy is our last line of defense.
For tech companies and platforms, the ethical imperative is clear. They must invest heavily in developing sophisticated detection methods and implementing ironclad policies against the distribution of tools designed for malicious intent. The story of Haotian is a chilling prophecy: as AI grows more sophisticated, so too must our collective defenses and digital acumen. The future of trust depends on it.
Imagine your utility bill soaring because of AI. That's the looming concern driving Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) to fire off stern letters to tech titans like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. They're not just probing data center developers; they're demanding answers on how the digital age's insatiable hunger for power is impacting Americans' wallets and the very stability of our energy grids. This isn't just about kilowatts; it's about the hidden costs of the AI revolution and its startling sustainability challenge.
The internet thrives on data centers. These aren't just server rooms; they're sprawling, energy-intensive digital factories. Their growth is explosive, especially with the AI boom. Training a single large language model, for instance, can consume as much electricity as hundreds of homes for a year. Powering advanced cloud computing, everyday streaming, and countless AI inferences demands colossal energy. But it's not just the processors. Crucial cooling systems, running 24/7 to prevent catastrophic overheating, add significantly to the load. This isn't a distant future problem. It's a rapidly accelerating present reality, placing immense strain on our energy infrastructure today.
This isn't a theoretical debate. Senators demand concrete answers from tech giants and developers on critical fronts:
This proactive inquiry marks a significant shift. It signals a growing political awareness of technology's immense physical footprint. It moves beyond abstract digital concerns to tangible, economic, and environmental impacts on communities and national resources.
For Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, this isn't merely a PR headache. It's a seismic challenge to their core growth strategies and operational models. Tech giants will face immense pressure. They must demonstrate not just a commitment to energy efficiency, but verifiable, concrete plans for decarbonizing their vast operations. Expect to see:
For consumers, the repercussions could range from subtle shifts in utility pricing structures to a far more transparent understanding of the true environmental and economic cost of our increasingly digital lives. The ultimate objective? To forge a critical balance between relentless technological innovation and indispensable environmental stewardship.
This Congressional probe serves as a stark reminder: the digital world isn't virtual; it has immense, tangible physical consequences. As AI accelerates its explosive trajectory, ensuring its infrastructure is powered responsibly and sustainably becomes a defining challenge of our generation. This investigation is a crucial, overdue step towards a more transparent and accountable future for the very backbone of our digital economy.
agent AI AI Agent AI design AIGC AIGC 周报 AIGC,-豆包APP更新,DeepSeek #月之暗面 #AI模型发布 ,AI产业化应用,人工智能发展 AI创业 AI 周报 AI安全 AI工具 AI 工具 AI 市场报告 AI 投资 AI早报 AI模型 Ai 模型 AI模型发布 Claude Code DeepSeek Mem N8N NAS notion OpenAI Product Hunt SAAS 个人知识库 互动学习 产品经理 人工智能 创业公司 多模态 大模型产品 大模型,大模型教学,RAG,aiagent实战,dify,coze,n8,工作流,aiagent 微软 微软Build大会 推理模型 本地部署 机器人,IOT,AGI,小智ai机器人 民意调查 游戏 私有化部署 科技伦理 经验分享