
谷歌TPU的四大“不对称优势”:芯片战争的真正玩法
在AI硬件领域,谷歌的TPU正迅速成为对抗英伟达的强劲对手,改变市场格局。TPU不仅借助其系统架构优势和更高的实际运行效率,还通过创新金融模式挑战传统规则,提升竞争力,逐渐重塑AI基础设施的未来。

在AI硬件领域,谷歌的TPU正迅速成为对抗英伟达的强劲对手,改变市场格局。TPU不仅借助其系统架构优势和更高的实际运行效率,还通过创新金融模式挑战传统规则,提升竞争力,逐渐重塑AI基础设施的未来。
不少宝子想尝试用低代码平台玩玩workflow或者rag,但是Coze、Dify和N8N这些平台应该怎么选?各自特点是什么?到底哪个适合你?老兵帮宝子们分析一下。 📌不扯犊子,不卖关子,先说老兵总结的结论:Coze = Bot as a S...

本报告旨在提供一个推理算力需求从用户渗透到 Token 调用、再到硬件支出的分析框架,我们通过对 Google 与微软(OpenAI)未来 Token 调用量、算力总需求和未来硬件支出节奏的测算,得出结论:推理算力需求增长速度快于单位算力成...

由于价值错位和成本压力,传统的定价方式正在失效。软件公司对全新颠覆性定价模式的需求比以往任何时候都更高涨。 最近,国外科技作者 Kyle Poyar 收集了超过 240 家软件公司的数据,这些公司的年经常性收入(ARR)在 100 万至 2...

文丨丁灵波 最近几天,AI圈正迎来一轮技术冲击波,只因今年的微软Build开发者大会和谷歌I/O开发者大会撞期了,两大科技巨头在AI领域的布局各有千秋,对于全球开发者而言,又有一大批AI工具扑面而来。美国西雅图当地时间5月19日,微软Bui...

今天凌晨,奥特曼突然发文宣布推出自家最新的 o 系列模型:满血版 o3 和 o4-mini,同时表示这两款模型都可以自由调用 ChatGPT 里的各种工具,包括但不限于图像生成、图像分析、文件解释、网络搜索、Python。 总的来说,就是比...

2025 年版的 AI 50 强名单显示了公司如何使用代理和推理模型来承担真实的企业工作流程 人工智能将在 2025 年进入一个新的阶段。多年来,AI 工具主要根据命令回答问题或生成内容,而今年的创新是关于 AI 真正完成工作。2025 年...

问 open ai 那20 个工作最有可能被 AI 所取代。看看O3 的回复.. 温馨提醒:信息来自AI 生成,娱乐为上,切莫上头 提问:列出20个OpenAI的GPT-4o推理模型可能会取代人类的工作,并按概率排序。 O3 回答:我将研究...

DeepSeek-R1以始料未及的速度引发了全球AI社区的狂热,但有关DeepSeek的高质量信息相对匮乏。2025年1月26日,拾象创始人兼CEO李广密,组织了一场关于 DeepSeek的闭门讨论会,嘉宾包括数十位顶尖AI研究员、投资人与...

就在今天,豆包APP发布全新更新,实时通话功能迎来全新的交互体验,语音更加拟人化,更加自然,已经完全贴近于人的情感语音。 几个小时后DeepSeek-R1发布,直接对标OpenAI o1,实力直接拉满,DeepSeek-v3已经受到广大用户...
Claude Skills 我的理解就是给大模型的技能工具包,他是可复用的指令包,通过封装团队的工作流程,业务逻辑和领域知识,解决了 AI 缺乏专业知识的鸿沟。
它将特定的程序化知识、业务逻辑和执行脚本打包,让 Agent 能像工作流一样较稳定的执行。

从使用层面上理解 Skills 是包含指令、脚本和资源的文件夹,供 LLM 可以动态加载,底层采用的是渐进式披露,也就是仅在需要的时候加载技能的详细指令,能有效节省宝贵的上下文窗口。
Skills 带来的是一种全新的 AI Agent 协作模式,过去,我们需要在每次对话中提供背景知识和操作指南,现在,借助 Skills,我们可以将这些知识封装起来,给到 AI 使用。

要想很好的理解 Skills ,就得先看清现阶段 AI 面临的一些问题。
1、对话是短暂的:每一次新的 Chat 对话都要从 0 开始,通常无法记住之前讨论,项目的具体背景和团队的工作流程。
2、知识是分散的:团队经验(数据结构、业务逻辑等)分散在 Wiki、文档里,AI 无法直接调用
3、重复劳动多:开发者 / 用户需反复在提示词中解释细节,既耗时又导致 AI 输出不一致

就好比一个新入职的员工,想要快速上手项目就得需要各种知识和技能,Skills 更像是模块化的知识包,给 AI 量身定制。

那 Skills 的核心机制是通过渐进式披露 (Progressive Disclosure),通过分层加载信息,确保 AI 总能获取所需知识,同时最大化利用上下文的效率。

从文件夹层面,来做个剖析吧。
通常会包含这几大部分:

其中 SKILL. md 内部剖析如下:

Skill 能否被准确触发,完全取决于其SKILL. md 中 description 的质量。它非简单的关键词匹配,而是 Claude 对其能力和适用场景的语义理解。

Skills 是构建强大 Al Agent 的核心基石,但它并非孤立存在。为了发挥最大潜能,我们需要理解它如何与 Anthropic 生态系统中的其他组件协同工作。

通过插件安装的 skills 需要在 .claude/plugins/marketplaces/ 这个目录下查看:

或者也可以直接输入命令安装插件:
/plugin install document-skills@anthropic-agent-skills
当安装好 skills 后,需要重启一下 Claude Code。
要想使用的话,可以直接指定 skill,也可以按照用户意图,Agent 自动选择合适的 skill。
比如输入 prompt:
用 pptx skill 创建一个关于 Claude Skills 的演示文稿

可以看到先是去用 HTML 来写 PPT,然后调用 pptx skill 里面的 html2pptx.md 约束,把 html 转为 PPT。

而这个约束文件 html2pptx.md 是对 html 转 PPT 的一些约束规则和条件,通过 markdown 的形式约束了。

Claude Skills 经过一番苦战,终于完成了。

我们来看下效果:

靠,非常不错啊。一个做 PPT 的 skill 就这样安装好了。
Anthropic 官方的 skill 仓库提供了不少有用的 skill,开源地址如下:

也可以在 Skills 市场找到非常多的 skill:https://skillsmp.com/zh
目前已经有 58925 个 Skills 了:

然后可以在这里用 AI 来搜索你想要的 Skills,也可以按照分类查找。

那都有哪些必装的 skill 呢?给大家推荐几款:
Anthropic 官方出品,能够自动写 skill 的 skill。

地址:https://github.com/anthropics/skills/tree/main/skills/skill-creator
这个是一个完整的软件开发工作流程的 skill,包含需求文档、开发、测试等流程。

地址:https://github.com/obra/superpowers
可以很方便的用来写 X 文章,早就有这个痛点,没想到这么快就有对应的工具了。

地址:https://github.com/wshuyi/x-article-publisher-skill
能在 Claude Code 里面直接和 NotebookLM 对话,并上传 PDF 直接到 NotebookLM。

地址:https://github.com/PleasePrompto/notebooklm-skill
由 obsidian 老板亲自写的 skills,能够生成 Obsidian 增强型 Markdown,自动添加标签、日期,不破坏原有格式,生成内容可直接存入 Obsidian 库。还能直接生成 Obsidian Canvas 白板。
这个甚至就可以直接在 obsidian 里面安装。

然后输入提示词:用obsidian-skills画一个 canvas 来解读这一篇文章”开源版 Claude Code 火爆全网,已狂飙 51.7k Star。。。”

可以看到,图就很快出来了:


非常推荐大家先安装 Anthropic 官方的一个 skill:skill-creator,他是专门用来安装 skill 的 skill。

按照同样的方法先安装这个 skill:
帮我直接安装这个skill,地址:https://github.com/anthropics/skills/blob/main/skills/skill-creator,克隆这个 skill 到我的已存在的技能目录~/.claude/skills

下面就可以在 CC 里面快速的创建 skill
创建一个 skill,能自动将 pdf 转为 PPT

开始一顿操作来创建这个 skill 了:

接下来就什么都不用管了,很快就生成好了这个 skill:

对应的文件夹也生成 ok 了。

来做下验证,输入以下提示词:
帮我把“值得去的IT公司(武汉篇).pdf”转为 ppt 格式

转好了:

打开项目看一下:

来看看效果,没什么问题:

做一个 skill 几分钟时间,非常方便。
Skills 改变了我们与 AI 协作的基本方式。它们将一次性的提示,转变为持久、可组合的知识资产。
通过为 AI 建立一个可扩展的程序性记忆库,Skills 正在为下一代代更强大、更自主、更能与人类专家无缝协作的 AI Agent 奠定基础。
Skills 把各种经验和方法打包成技能包,降低了跨行使用的成本,普通人也更加方便的创作自己的 Agent 了。
我觉得,掌握 Skills,就是掌握了将组织智慧规模化的能力。
未来,Skills 还会一如火爆,会有越来越多的 Skills 出来。
好了,今天的文章就到这里了,谢谢你喜欢我的文章,我们下期见。
本文由人人都是产品经理作者【苍何】,微信公众号:【苍何】
Your Facebook feed just got tackled. If you follow NFL teams, you've likely seen it: the unsettling surge of AI-generated 'slop.' This isn't your grandma's spam. It's a brazen, pervasive wave of misinformation, meticulously crafted to exploit fan passion. Imagine a fake news blitz, directly targeting the heart of football fandom. Recent reports confirm it: NFL-related Facebook pages are awash with egregious AI content. One particularly chilling instance involved a fabricated death claim – not even a player, just a random person caught in the digital crossfire. This isn't just annoying; it's a direct assault on information integrity, demanding immediate attention from every tech professional.
Facebook has always been a battleground against spam. Dubious ads, clickbait – we've seen the playbook. But generative AI rewrites the rules. It's injected a potent, concerning new element: 'AI slop.' This isn't merely bad grammar; it's a digital Frankenstein. Think oddly distorted player images, text that skirts the edge of believability, and narratives just polished enough to slip past initial moderation. These are digital lures, designed to grab eyeballs. For NFL fans, the bait is irresistible. Passionate, emotionally invested, always hungry for team news – this demographic is a goldmine for bad actors. Fabricated tragedies, scandals, sensational 'breaking news' – these stories are engineered for virality, driving traffic to shadowy sites or amplifying malicious accounts. It's a digital con game, played out on a global stage.
Falsely claiming a death isn't just misinformation; it's a digital poison. This crosses a grave line. It's not a minor factual error; it's a profoundly cruel act, inflicting immense emotional distress on families, friends, and entire communities. The deployment of AI for such malicious ends reveals a chilling ethical void. It screams about the gaping holes in content moderation. On platforms the size of Facebook, these mechanisms are failing, allowing tragedy to be manufactured and spread at machine speed.
This isn't mere digital clutter. It's a seismic tremor shaking the very foundations of our information ecosystem. The AI slop problem, particularly on Facebook, carries profound weight:
Erosion of Trust: Each fabricated story, especially the heinous ones, gnaws at user confidence. When reality blurs with AI-generated fiction, users disengage. Or worse: they become pawns in a larger disinformation game.
Brand Damage: For the NFL, its teams, and star players, a deluge of false narratives on fan pages isn't just noise. It dilutes official messaging. It tarnishes reputations. It undermines authenticity.
Platform Integrity: Facebook's moderation has always been under the microscope. Now, it's an AI vs. AI showdown. Generative AI churns out spam; algorithmic defenses scramble to catch it. Can platforms win this high-stakes digital arms race, or are they perpetually playing catch-up?
Societal Impact: A fake death claim about a non-player feels isolated. But it's a dangerous precedent. This unchecked technology isn't confined to sports. It's a blueprint for political manipulation, sophisticated financial scams, and the tearing apart of social cohesion. The stakes are immense.
Users are the frontline defense. Vigilance is paramount. Here's your playbook:
Be Skeptical: Does that 'breaking news' feel too sensational? Is the grammar subtly wrong, or the image just... off? These are glaring red flags. Trust your gut.
Verify Sources: Before you react or share, hit pause. Cross-reference with official team websites, established sports journalists, or major news outlets. A quick search often reveals the truth.
Report and Block: Don't just scroll past. Use Facebook's reporting tools. Each report trains the algorithms. Each block cleans your feed. Your action matters.
The battle against AI-generated misinformation will be brutal. Platforms like Facebook face immense pressure: deploy smarter AI detection, bolster human moderation. But generative AI's sheer scale and velocity demand more than a single strategy. It requires a multi-pronged assault. Innovation from tech giants. Razor-sharp critical thinking from every user. Continuous digital literacy education. The NFL's Facebook pages are merely a high-profile symptom; the disease is systemic. For tech professionals, comprehending this threat and championing robust solutions isn't merely 'good practice.' It's essential for preserving a healthy, trustworthy digital public square. The game is on.
From U2's record-breaking residency to mind-bending custom content, the Las Vegas Sphere has redefined live entertainment. Its colossal 160,000-square-foot LED exosphere and 16K resolution interior screen have captivated global audiences, proving an insatiable demand for truly novel experiences. Now, that same groundbreaking spectacle is eyeing the East Coast. Sphere Entertainment has confirmed its intent to develop a second U.S. Sphere venue in Maryland, a mere 15 minutes south of Washington D.C.
But this isn't simply a replica. The proposed Maryland Sphere introduces a fascinating twist: a significantly smaller scale, designed to seat approximately 6,000 people compared to Las Vegas's 17,000+. This strategic pivot begs crucial questions: What does this mean for the future of immersive entertainment, urban development, and the very concept of live experiences? Prepare to go beyond the visuals.
The Las Vegas Sphere isn't just a venue; it's a technological marvel. Imagine stepping inside a 360-degree digital canvas, where every surface is a pixel, and the sound envelops you with 160,000 beamforming speakers. This isn't just a concert; it's an alternate reality. The success in Vegas, attracting millions and generating immense buzz, serves as Sphere Entertainment's undeniable proof-of-concept. It validates the colossal investment in proprietary technology and design, laying a clear path for expansion. The strategic question was never "if" they would build another, but "where," and critically, "how big"?
The decision to pursue a 6,000-seat capacity for the Maryland Sphere is perhaps the most intriguing detail, a strategic miniaturization. Why scale down a winning, colossal formula? This isn't a retreat; it's a calculated expansion.
Increased Feasibility: A smaller footprint and reduced capacity dramatically enhance the financial viability of such a complex, expensive venue. It unlocks potential for a wider array of global cities beyond mega-destinations like Las Vegas, making the "Sphere experience" more accessible.
Event Diversity: While the Vegas Sphere dominates with large-scale concerts and blockbuster spectacles, a 6,000-seat venue expands the programming spectrum. Picture intimate musical acts, cutting-edge corporate presentations, high-stakes immersive eSports tournaments, or unique theatrical productions – all within a contained, yet still spectacular, digital ecosystem.
Testing New Models: This Maryland site could function as a crucial prototype for a modular, scalable Sphere model. Success here could revolutionize the rollout strategy, making these next-gen venues a more widespread urban fixture, akin to how IMAX theaters proliferated globally after initial large-scale successes.
This potential Maryland Sphere isn't merely another entertainment venue; it's a potential blueprint for the future of scalable immersive experiences, a strategic chess move in the global entertainment game.
The choice of Maryland, specifically south of Washington D.C., is a masterstroke in strategic placement. The D.C. metropolitan area isn't just a capital; it's a vibrant, diverse economic powerhouse, boasting a population exceeding 6 million residents across Maryland, Virginia, and D.C. proper, alongside a constant influx of over 20 million tourists and business travelers annually. This is a demographic hungry for innovation.
Massive Audience Access: Unparalleled proximity to millions of residents and a robust tourist industry guarantees a vast, built-in audience base, ready to experience the next generation of entertainment.
Economic Opportunity: The project promises significant job creation, a surge in tourism revenue, and a powerful statement cementing the region's status as a hub for both innovation and world-class entertainment.
Diverse Programming Potential: Beyond traditional concerts, imagine high-impact government-related events, immersive educational experiences for students, or international conferences leveraging this unique, high-tech architectural wonder. The possibilities are as vast as the Sphere's digital canvas.
This move firmly plants Sphere Entertainment's flag in the heart of the Mid-Atlantic, positioning it as a cultural beacon for a region eager for unparalleled cultural and entertainment offerings.
This is an "intent to develop" announcement, a critical distinction. A timeline and exact location remain pending finalization. Constructing a venue of this complexity is a Herculean task, fraught with significant hurdles: intricate land acquisition, navigating complex zoning laws, rigorous environmental reviews, extensive community engagement, and securing massive capital investment. These processes are not sprints; they are marathons.
Yet, the potential rewards are monumental. A Maryland Sphere could fundamentally redefine the East Coast entertainment landscape, delivering an unparalleled fusion of cutting-edge technology and live performance – an experience few venues globally can hope to match. Will this smaller, strategically located Sphere prove the scalable model for immersive entertainment's widespread future, transforming urban centers worldwide? The world is watching this space with bated breath.
The gaming world is ablaze with AI debates. Fears of job displacement, concerns over artistic integrity – the 'AI backlash' is palpable. But what if gamers, deep down, already love AI in game development? This provocative question, posed by Razer CEO Min-Liang Tan at CES, challenges everything we think we know. During a candid live interview at Brooklyn Bowl in Las Vegas, the visionary behind Razer—a brand synonymous with cutting-edge gaming peripherals—unveiled a compelling counter-narrative. Tan's insights, extending far beyond high-performance mice and keyboards, dive into interactive entertainment's future. His claim? AI isn't merely a buzzword; it's the unseen engine quietly elevating our favorite games, often without us even noticing.
AI's integration into gaming often ignites controversy. Gamers, fiercely passionate about their virtual worlds, decry 'soulless' generative content or the specter of AI replacing human artists. These fears dominate headlines. Yet, Tan's counter-narrative is potent: what if our collective anxiety stems from the idea of AI, not its actual, often invisible, benefits? This disconnect is crucial. Are we misinterpreting AI's true role? This question could redefine the industry's entire approach.
Min-Liang Tan isn't merely speculating; he speaks from Razer's vanguard position in gaming innovation. He champions AI not as a replacement, but as a powerful enabler. Think: NPCs that learn your combat style, procedurally generated galaxies stretching infinitely, or difficulty curves that subtly adapt to your skill. He cited Razer's partnership with Grok, even mentioning the creation of "anime waifus"—a specific, if eyebrow-raising, example. This isn't about automating art away; it's about AI generating complex character models, intricate textures, or entire environmental assets with unprecedented speed. This expands creative bandwidth, allowing human designers to focus on narrative and core gameplay. It's not cutting corners; it's expanding the canvas.
AI's genius in gaming often hides in plain sight. You rarely see it, but you definitely feel its effect. It's the invisible architect.
These aren't futuristic concepts; they're present realities. By reveling in these elevated experiences, gamers are, as Tan suggests, implicitly endorsing AI's profound impact.
Min-Liang Tan's CES revelation is a clarion call. The AI discourse in gaming must mature beyond baseless fear. Developers should view AI not as a competitor, but as an indispensable partner—a forge for innovation, a brush for more intricate worlds, a lever for streamlined workflows. For gamers, it's an invitation to acknowledge AI's quiet, positive influence. The core message is clear: AI is an enhancement engine. It amplifies human creativity, delivering deeper, more immersive experiences. As AI evolves, bridging this perception gap becomes paramount. The goal? Ensure technology truly serves creativity, always prioritizing the player.
Breakthroughs in AI hit headlines daily. Yet, OpenAI, a titan in the field, just signaled a profound shift. CFO Sarah Friar reveals their 2026 vision isn't merely about larger, more powerful models. Instead, the focus is "practical adoption" of AI. This isn't just semantics; it's a recalibration. What does this pivot mean for enterprises scrambling to harness this transformative technology? The answer will redefine AI's future.
The tech world knows this tune: vast potential, colossal investment, yet a chasm often separates innovation from daily utility. OpenAI, spearheading the AI revolution, pours billions into compute, data, and talent. Friar's insight is sharp: such astronomical spending demands a clear path to tangible ROI. The directive is unmistakable: AI's future isn't about raw capability; it's about undeniable utility. It's about moving AI from the lab bench to the factory floor.
For too long, AI's story, particularly with large language models (LLMs), fixated on "what's possible." Demos dazzled. Creative outputs astonished. Problem-solving feats impressed. Yet, for countless organizations, the reality involved endless experimentation, stalled pilot projects, and a constant battle. Integrating these powerful, often unwieldy, tools into existing workflows proved difficult. Demonstrating clear, quantifiable return on investment (ROI)? Even harder.
OpenAI's pivot isn't mere conjecture; it's a strategic mandate, forged in economic steel. Billions invested in compute, data, and top-tier talent demand accountability. The core question evolves: from 'Can we engineer it?' to 'Can businesses *actually deploy it* to solve complex, real-world problems at scale?' This laser focus on practical AI adoption signifies market maturation. The initial hype cycle is over. Now, the market demands robust, reliable, and seamlessly integrated solutions.
So, what does "practical adoption" actually look like on the ground? It's far more than an accessible API or a flashy demo. It's a multi-faceted blueprint for making AI genuinely indispensable:
This isn't about 'dumbing down' AI. It's about industrializing it. Imagine AI moving from a bespoke artisan workshop to a high-volume, precision factory. It means transforming AI's incredible raw power into robust, reliable tools that are accessible, dependable, and deliver undeniable, measurable business value.
This strategic recalibration by an AI vanguard will undoubtedly ripple across the entire industry. It's a clear signal: the initial 'gold rush' for raw AI capability is evolving. We're entering an era where demonstrable, real-world impact takes undisputed center stage.
While practical adoption ignites excitement, formidable challenges persist. Overcoming deep technical complexities, navigating intricate data governance labyrinths, orchestrating massive organizational change, and rigorously upskilling workforces remain critical hurdles. Yet, the opportunity is monumental: to democratize advanced AI, unlock unprecedented, systemic productivity gains, and fundamentally transform entire industries. It's about transitioning AI from the academic lab to the everyday operational workflow, from concept to tangible competitive advantage.
OpenAI's 2026 objective transcends mere technology; it embraces people and process. It's a commitment to integrate AI's incredible power not just into research papers or dazzling demo reels, but deeply into the very fabric of how businesses operate and how we live. This pragmatic, utility-driven approach isn't just a strategy; it's the potent catalyst poised to fully unleash AI's long-promised revolution.
In the high-stakes game of global technology, the pursuit of Artificial Intelligence (AI) dominance isn't just about innovation anymore; it's rapidly becoming a geopolitical imperative. And nowhere is this more apparent than in Europe, where the ambition to develop its own 'DeepSeek' — a powerful, domestically built AI champion — is taking on a new urgency. As the traditional alliances shift and the specter of AI dependence looms large, Europe is awakening to the critical need for AI self-sufficiency. But what exactly is driving this sudden, intensified push, and what does it mean for the global tech landscape?
For decades, the transatlantic tech relationship, particularly with the US, felt like an unbreakable bedrock. European industries often relied on American-made software, hardware, and, increasingly, AI models. Yet, recent geopolitical tensions, global trade disputes, and a general re-evaluation of international partnerships are forcing European leaders to confront a stark reality: what was once a convenience could quickly become a liability.
Imagine a scenario, however remote, where access to critical American AI infrastructure or models is restricted. The impact on industries—from defense and finance to healthcare and automotive—would be catastrophic. This isn't mere paranoia; it's strategic foresight. European reliance on external AI capabilities, especially those controlled by a single geopolitical bloc, is increasingly seen as a national security risk and an impediment to economic autonomy. This shift, from mere convenience to potential weakness, underscores profound implications for European sovereignty.
When we talk about Europe wanting its 'own DeepSeek,' it’s not necessarily about replicating a single project. Rather, 'DeepSeek' here serves as a potent metaphor. It represents the aspiration for a top-tier, competitive, and ethically aligned large language model (LLM) or general AI system developed within European borders.
The path to AI self-sufficiency is undoubtedly fraught with challenges. Europe has historically struggled with fragmented markets, slower venture capital growth compared to the US, and a persistent brain drain of top tech talent. However, significant strengths can be leveraged:
To truly build its own AI superpower, Europe will need to foster greater collaboration between member states, streamline funding mechanisms—perhaps through a dedicated pan-European AI fund—and create more attractive environments for both startups and top-tier AI engineers.
The shift towards AI sovereignty isn't just about a single model; it's about cultivating an entire ecosystem. This means investing heavily in:
This collective effort underscores a fundamental understanding: no single European nation can achieve AI superpower status alone. It requires a unified, strategic approach, a true digital single market of ideas and resources.
Europe's race to build its 'own DeepSeek' is far more than a technological challenge; it is a profound statement of geopolitical intent. It reflects a growing recognition that in the 21st century, technological autonomy—especially in foundational areas like AI—is inseparable from national and continental sovereignty. As the world navigates an increasingly complex digital future, Europe's urgent push for AI self-sufficiency could redefine its global role. This isn't just about catching up; it's about leading with a homegrown, ethical, and independent digital future.